Why Miley Cyrus Is Fighting to Dismiss the ‘Flowers’ Copyright Case
Jake Morrison
Staff Writer
Miley Cyrus’ legal team argues the similarities between ‘Flowers’ and Bruno Mars’ hit are just ‘commonplace’—here’s what that means for music copyright.
If you’ve been following the Miley Cyrus Flowers saga, you know it’s been a whirlwind. The song, a self-love anthem that topped charts and broke streaming records, is now at the center of a copyright lawsuit. But Cyrus isn’t backing down—she’s fighting to dismiss the case, and her argument might change how we think about music copyright forever.
What’s the Case About?
The lawsuit, filed by Tempo Music Investments, alleges that Flowers copied elements of Bruno Mars’ 2013 hit, When I Was Your Man. Specifically, Tempo claims there are similarities in the pitch sequences, lyrics, and even the song’s overall narrative. For example, Mars sings, “I should have bought you flowers,” while Cyrus retorts, “I can buy myself flowers.” Tempo argues this is more than coincidence—it’s copyright infringement.But Cyrus’ legal team disagrees. They’ve called the case “fatally flawed” and argue that the similarities are “commonplace” in breakup songs. In other words, you can’t copyright a universal sentiment like regret or self-empowerment.
Why Cyrus Thinks She’s in the Right
Cyrus’ lawyers have filed a motion to dismiss the case, claiming Tempo Music doesn’t have the legal standing to sue. Here’s why:- Partial Ownership Isn’t Enough: Tempo owns a portion of the rights to When I Was Your Man, but not the whole song. Under U.S. copyright law, partial ownership doesn’t give you the right to sue unless all co-owners join the case. Bruno Mars, Ari Levine, and Andrew Wyatt—the other co-authors—haven’t joined the lawsuit.
- Common Themes Aren’t Protected: Cyrus’ team argues that the similarities between the two songs are just ‘commonplace’ themes in music. You can’t copyright the idea of buying flowers or holding hands—it’s like trying to copyright the concept of heartbreak.
What This Means for Music Copyright
This case could set a precedent for how courts handle similar claims in the future. If Cyrus wins, it might make it harder for rights holders to sue over broad themes or common lyrical tropes. On the flip side, if Tempo wins, it could open the door for more lawsuits based on vague similarities.How Artists Can Protect Themselves
For musicians navigating the tricky waters of copyright law, here are a few tips:- Document Your Process: Keep drafts, recordings, and notes that show how your song evolved. This can help prove originality if someone accuses you of copying.
- Understand Fair Use: Familiarize yourself with the ‘fair use’ doctrine, which allows limited use of copyrighted material for purposes like commentary, parody, or education.
- Collaborate Carefully: If you’re working with co-writers, make sure everyone agrees on ownership rights before you start. This can prevent disputes down the line.
The Bigger Picture
Beyond the legal drama, this case raises bigger questions about creativity in music. How much of what we create is truly original, and how much is inspired by—or even borrowed from—what’s come before? As artists continue to push boundaries, these questions will only become more complex.So, what’s next for Flowers? Only time will tell. But one thing’s for sure: Miley Cyrus isn’t letting this case wilt her spirit.
AI-assisted, editorially reviewed. Source
Explainers · Tutorials · Beginner Guides